In the modern world, the word "assassin" denotes a mysterious figure in the shadows, bent on murder for purely political reasons rather than for love or money. Amazingly enough, that usage hasn't changed too much since the eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth centuries, when the Assassins of Persia struck fear (and daggers) into the hearts of the region's political and religious leaders.
Who were the real Assassins? What role did they play in the history of Persia, Syria, Turkey and the rest of the Middle East?
Origin of the Assassins:
The Assassins' library was destroyed when their fortress fell,
so we do not have any original sources on their history from their own
perspective. Most of what survives comes from their enemies, or from
fanciful second- or third-hand European accounts.
However, we know that the Assassins were a branch of the Ismaili sect of Shia Islam. The founder of the Assassins was a Nizari Ismaili missionary called Hasan-i Sabbah, who infiltrated the castle at Alamut with his followers, and bloodlessly ousted the resident king of Daylam in 1090.
From this mountaintop fortress, Sabbah and his faithful followers established a network of strongholds and challenged the ruling Seljuk Turks, Sunni Muslims who controlled Persia at the time.
However, we know that the Assassins were a branch of the Ismaili sect of Shia Islam. The founder of the Assassins was a Nizari Ismaili missionary called Hasan-i Sabbah, who infiltrated the castle at Alamut with his followers, and bloodlessly ousted the resident king of Daylam in 1090.
From this mountaintop fortress, Sabbah and his faithful followers established a network of strongholds and challenged the ruling Seljuk Turks, Sunni Muslims who controlled Persia at the time.
The Name "Assassins":
Nobody knows with certainty where the name "Assassins" came from. The
most commonly-repeated theory holds that the word comes from the Arabic hashishi, meaning "hashish users." Chroniclers including Marco Polo
claimed that the followers of Sabbah committed their political murders
while under the influence of drugs, hence the derogatory nickname.
However, this etymology may well have arisen after the name itself, as a
creative attempt to explain its origins. In any case, Hasan-i Sabbah
strictly interpreted the Koran's injunction against intoxicants.
Assassin Tactics:
In order to get rid of anti-Nizari rulers, clerics and
officials, the Assassins would carefully study the languages and
cultures of their targets. An operative would then infiltrate the court
or inner circle of the intended victim, sometimes serving for years as
an advisor or servant. At an opportune moment, the Assassin would stab
the sultan,
vizier or mullah with a dagger in a surprise attack. Assassins were
promised a place in Paradise following their martyrdom, which generally
took place shortly after the attack. Officials throughout the
Middle East were terrified of these surprise attacks; many took to
wearing armor or chain-mail shirts under their clothes, just in case.
The Assassins' Victims:
For the most part, the Assassins' victims were Seljuk Turks
or their allies. The first and one of the best-known was Nizam
al-Mulk, a Persian who served as vizier to the Seljuk court. He was
killed in October of 1092 by an Assassin disguised as a Sufi mystic.
A Sunni caliph, Mustarshid, fell to Assassin daggers in 1131 during a succession dispute.
In 1213, the sharif of the holy city of Mecca lost his cousin to an Assassin. He was particularly upset about the attack because this cousin closely resembled him. Convinced that he was the real target, he took all Persian and Syrian pilgrims hostage until a rich lady from Alamut paid their ransom.
A Sunni caliph, Mustarshid, fell to Assassin daggers in 1131 during a succession dispute.
In 1213, the sharif of the holy city of Mecca lost his cousin to an Assassin. He was particularly upset about the attack because this cousin closely resembled him. Convinced that he was the real target, he took all Persian and Syrian pilgrims hostage until a rich lady from Alamut paid their ransom.
Assassins vs. Seljuks:
Why did the Assassins attack the Seljuks? As Shi'ites, many
Persians had long felt mistreated by the Arabic Sunni Muslims who
controlled the Caliphate for centuries. When the power of the caliphs
faltered in the 10th-11th centuries, and Christian Crusaders began to
harry them in the eastern Mediterranean, the Shi'a thought their moment
had come.
However, a new menace arose to the east, in the form of the newly-converted Turks. Fervent in their beliefs, and militarily powerful, the Sunni Seljuks took control of a vast region including Persia. Outnumbered, the Nizari Shi'a could not defeat them in open battle. From a series of mountaintop fortresses in Persia and Syria, however, they could assassinate Seljuk leaders - and strike fear into their allies.
However, a new menace arose to the east, in the form of the newly-converted Turks. Fervent in their beliefs, and militarily powerful, the Sunni Seljuks took control of a vast region including Persia. Outnumbered, the Nizari Shi'a could not defeat them in open battle. From a series of mountaintop fortresses in Persia and Syria, however, they could assassinate Seljuk leaders - and strike fear into their allies.
Advance of the Mongols:
In 1219, the ruler of Khwarezm, in what is now Uzbekistan, made a huge mistake. He had a group of Mongol traders murdered in his city. Genghis Khan
was furious at this affront, and led his army into Central Asia to
punish Khwarezm. Prudently, the leader of the Assassins pledged loyalty
to the Mongols at that time.
By 1237, the Mongols had conquered most of Central Asia. All of Persia had fallen except for the strongholds of the Assassins - perhaps as many as 100 mountain fortresses.
By 1237, the Mongols had conquered most of Central Asia. All of Persia had fallen except for the strongholds of the Assassins - perhaps as many as 100 mountain fortresses.
The Assassins had enjoyed a
relatively free hand in the region between the Mongols' 1219 conquest of
Kwarezm and the 1250s. The Mongols were focusing elsewhere, and ruled
lightly. However, Genghis Khan's grandson Mongke Khan grew determined
to conquer the Islamic lands by taking Baghdad, seat of the caliphate.
Fearful of this renewed interest in his region, the Assassin leader sent a team to kill Mongke. They were supposed to pretend to offer submission to the Mongol khan, and then stab him. Mongke's guards suspected treachery and turned the Assassins away, but the damage was done. Mongke was determined to end the threat of the Assassins once and for all.
Hodgson, Marshall. The Order of Assassins: The Struggle of the Early Nizari Ismailis against the Islamic World, 's-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co., 1955.
Lewis, Bernard. The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam, New York: Octogon Books, 1980.
Weatherford, Jack. Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World, New York: Three Rivers Press, 2004.
Fearful of this renewed interest in his region, the Assassin leader sent a team to kill Mongke. They were supposed to pretend to offer submission to the Mongol khan, and then stab him. Mongke's guards suspected treachery and turned the Assassins away, but the damage was done. Mongke was determined to end the threat of the Assassins once and for all.
Downfall of the Assassins:
Mongke Khan's brother Hulagu set out to besiege the Assassins in
their primary fortress at Alamut. The sect leader who ordered the
attack on Mongke had been killed by his own followers for drunkenness,
and his rather useless son now held power.
The Mongols threw all of their military might against Alamut, while also offering clemency if the Assassin leader would surrender. On November 19, 1256, he did so. Hulagu paraded the captured leader in front of all the remaining strongholds, and one by one they capitulated. The Mongols tore down the castles at Alamut and other places, so that the Assassins could not take refuge and regroup there.
The following year, the
former Assassin leader asked permission to travel to Karakoram, the
Mongol capital, in order to offer his submission to Mongke Khan in
person. After the arduous journey, he arrived but was denied an
audience. Instead, he and his followers were taken out into the
surrounding mountains and killed. It was the end of the Assassins.The Mongols threw all of their military might against Alamut, while also offering clemency if the Assassin leader would surrender. On November 19, 1256, he did so. Hulagu paraded the captured leader in front of all the remaining strongholds, and one by one they capitulated. The Mongols tore down the castles at Alamut and other places, so that the Assassins could not take refuge and regroup there.
Sources:
Franzius, Enno. History of the Order of the Assassins, New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1969.Hodgson, Marshall. The Order of Assassins: The Struggle of the Early Nizari Ismailis against the Islamic World, 's-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co., 1955.
Lewis, Bernard. The Assassins: A Radical Sect in Islam, New York: Octogon Books, 1980.
Weatherford, Jack. Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World, New York: Three Rivers Press, 2004.
No comments:
Post a Comment